Q: Is there a chance that we will see the M60A1 introduced into the tech tree for the USA, to help update it a bit to a current standard of other nations with vehicles from the 1960's (T-62A, Leopard 1, AMX-30B, ect.). As well as make the US tier 10 medium competitive with other nations.
-Not A1:)) smth else, I really want to improve US med line.

M60a1 안나오지만 미국 미듐 손 보고 싶어함

How bad did the Chieftain armor have to be for them to hold off putting it in?
Just put it in. It's not like this will be the first time they put an underpowered tank in game... and they can always buff it.
-It’s bad enough, T-54 or is-3 can pen turret with regular ammo, not just cupola. You simply cannot tank enemy shells in tier X with this tank. We have enough of glass cannon tanks in the game, why add another?

치프틴은 해치가 아니더라도 포탑이 떼오사나 숙삼 은탄에도 뚫린다. 이것 때문에 지체된 거임.

ALSO chinese tds???? Type 89! HEHEHE (imo chinese tanks need a buff)
-Yes, medium line and some of the HTs and LTs need help.

짱깨 트리 손 봐야 한다고 여기고 있음

Could you ask what will become of super high alpha tanks like jaegeroo, waffen and death star? I hope they get slightly nerfed in a way...
-JP100 will be fine, less alpha, more gun comfort, the tank concept is sound and I don’t want to nerf it. WT100 will be replaced. 183mm guns will be reworked with new HESH.

잦이백은 알파뎀 낮추는 대신 포신 안정성 버프, 바이백 대체 예정, 183mm 새로운 해쉬탄 추가 예정

Personally, I don't get why everyone is chomping at the bit to nerf the T110E5. Why not keep the new machine gun turret as-is? It still has other weak spots to be exploited. From what I can gather, getting that armor buff now allows it to act as a real heavy on the battlefield.
-E5 will not be kept as it is, no chance to avoid nerf – it is simply the best heavy AND the best US T10 medium (it has more fire power and survivability than an M48A1 while comparable on mobility) defacto at the moment.  That might be not the armor nerf tho, mobility nerf is another option, or some other option

E5는 M48보다 화력과 생존성이 딸리지 않기 때문에 장갑 너프는 확정에다가 보너스로 기동성이나 다른 것도 너프할 것을 고려 중임.