- SerB on Gaijin War Thunder tanks, when asked what he thinks about them:

= 가이진 워썬더 탱크에 대한 써브의 생각:

“We do watch them. Company Gaijin, by the way, puts a lot of effort into making its project NOT resembling WoT (true, not always – for example module unlocking they made basically the same as we have it in the end, only instead of normal stock modules they give out “worn out” modules). And so their experience is very valuable for us, mostly in the “how not to do it” part. But if they – let’s say – manage to make a playable tank game with better historicity (Tiger with heavier turret(c)), we will gladly learn from their experience”

= "보긴 봤는데, 그쪽에서 월탱이랑 안닮게 하려고 노력을 많이 했음. 그리고 걔들의 경험은 우리에게 매우 값짐. 대부분 "저렇겐 하면 안되겠네" 쪽이지만. 그러나 만약 걔들이 고증성을 지키는 탱크게임을 만드려고 한다면 우리도 기쁘게 배울거임

- SU-152 Taran is not planned

= SU-152 타란은 계획없음

- Q (on SerB): “How did the EU community react on the Stalin inscriptions returning?” A: “Majority doesn’t care, the only ones with butthurting are the Polish (it’s their national sport) and – oddly enough – Romanians”

= Q: "돌아온 스탈린 문구에 대해 유럽 커뮤니티 반응 어떰?" A: "대부분 신경안쓰는데 폴란드랑 루마니아만 난리임"

- SerB on Comet being UP: “I don’t understand how bad a player you have to be not to pwn in Comet”

= 써브가 코멧이 구리다는 것에 대해: "얼마나 못하면 코멧타고 캐리도 못함? 이해가 안되네"

- SerB on dynamic tank characteristics in hangar: “In my opinion, this is what should have been made instead of screwing up shell sliders. But our UI makers have their own vision”

= 써브가 차고의 동적 탱크 스텟에 대해: "내 생각엔 이상한 포탄 슬라이더말고 이거부터 했어야했는데, 하지만 우리의 UI 제작자는 자기 비전이 있겠지."

- Landkreuzer Ratte will not appear in WoT even as map decoration

= 지상전함 라테는 월탱에 장식으로도 안나올거임

- what will follow in branch after Chaffee? “No comment”

= 채피 이후에 어떤 트리 생길거임? "노코멘트"

- the “you get as much XP for losing as you get for winning if you get a medal” feature in 8.8 test will make it to the public server

= 8.8 테섭에서 "훈장을 따면 져도 승리XP를 받는" 기능은 일반 서버에도 생길거임

- SerB states that WoT made the Kubinka museum increase its visitor count 4 times

= 써브는 월탱이 쿠빈카 박물관의 방문자를 4배 늘렸다고 한다

- SerB on various player-made “votes” and “surveys” about game matters: “We will be guided by player surveys only if democracy is brought to Wargaming by American bombers, or if the players buy 51 percent of WG shares”

= 써브가 게임에 대해 유저들이 만든 다양한 "투표"나 "설문조사"같은 거에 대해: "우리를 유저 의견에 따르게 하려면 미국 폭격기들이 워게이밍에 민주주의를 가져오던가 유저들이 워게이밍 주식 51%을 사야함"

- Player Kwot34 asks SerB: “What will be your thoughts if I show you my Comet results?” A:”(my thoughts will be) ‘Am I such a bad player as Kwot34?’”

= Kwot34가 써브에게 질문: "내 코멧 전적 보여주면 무슨 생각 할거야?" A: "(내생각은) '내가 Kwot34같은 배드가이인가?'"

- 8.8 lower frontal armor of Tiger II (100mm) is historical (SS: yes it is, according to Doyle), the 120mm LFP is a mistake coming from one Russian book by an author named Barjatinskij, it’s widespread on RU forums

= 8.8 킹타의 하부전면장갑 (100밀)은 고증임 (영주: ㅇㅇ 맞음), 120밀 하전장은 Barjatinskij가 쓴 책에서 나온 실수고 그게 러시아 포럼에 퍼져있었음

- the 8.8 Superpershing frontal armor is now completely historical

= 8.8 슈퍼퍼싱 전면 장갑은 이제 완전히 고증임

- Jagdtiger 88 won’t be changed as a part of the 8.8 German changes, because it is a premium vehicle. For now at least.

= 88야티는 일단 지금은 8.8 독일 변경에 포함안될거임. 왜냐면 그건 골탱이니까,

- Jagdtiger lower frontal plate will also be reduced from 120 to 100mm

= 야티 하부 전면판도 120에서 100밀로 줄어들거임

- Q: “Okay, you are not changing JT88 so more people buy it?” A: “Conspiracy everywhere, how are we supposed to live with that?!”

= Q: "88야티 더 팔려고 안바꾸는거지?" A: "아아 세상에 음모가 가득해"

- Q: “JT88 was not touched ‘for now’, is it possible it will be nerfed and gold will be returned like in SP case?” A: “Everything’s possible”

= Q: "지금은 88야티 안건든다고? 그럼 슈퍼퍼싱처럼 너프된 후에 골드환불해줄 수도 있음?" A: "못할거 없지"

- crew XP gain mechanism was not touched in 8.8

= 8.8에서 승무원 XP 누적 메카니즘은 안건들임

- WG considers 1 degree error in armor slope compared to the historical original acceptable

= 워게이밍은 장갑 각도가 고증과 1도 차이나는건 용인함

- E-75 might be buffed a bit for test 2 of 8.8 in order to compensate for the loss of the 1200hp engine

= 이치로가 두번째 8.8 테스트에서 1200마력 엔진을 잃는 보상으로 조금 버프될 수도 있음

- SerB is very invested in WoT Xbox 360

= 써브는 월탱 엑박 360에 많이 투자함

- SerB answers to a player, who suggested the Object 140 to be on tier 9 and refers to a player survey that the players want it: “It’s a stupid proposal. You proposed the branch that was intended originally. But the problem is – the proposal to put Object 140 on tier 9 was already declined. We talked about this earlier. But you and others like you don’t read, you only write… and putting Object 140 on tier 9 will not succeed even if 100500 players vote for this stupidity.”

= 써브가 Obj 140을 9티어로 넣자고 설문조사하는 유저에게: "그건 멍청한 제안이야. 내가 저번에 이미 그 의견은 거절되었다고 했는데 읽지도 않고... 100500명이 이 뻘짓에 투표해도 소용없을거야"

- Object 140 is better armored than T-54

= Obj 140은 떼오사보다 장갑이 좋음

- about demolitions of bridges in WOT (when Havok is implemented): “In World of Tanks we’ll have to solve the issue with tanks standing under them getting buried by the rubble”

= 월탱에서 다리를 파괴하는 것에 대해 (하복 구현되면) "그럼 돌무더기에 깔린 탱크들에 대한 문제를 해결해야함"