출처 : https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/devialet-phantom-v-s-focal-be6.2106/

wanted to test the phantom for a long time. I ordered a pair of Gold and compare them with my studio monitor focal be6+focal cms sub.

팬텀 측정하기를 고대하고 있었다. 포칼 BE6 +CMS 서브우퍼 세트랑 비교해봄

On the bass side, Devialet didn't lie and deliver an almost flat to 20hz beating my cms sub which is flat only to 30hz.
After that they are both very similar and reflect the poor quality of the room.

포칼 세트랑 비교해봤는데 진짜 20Hz 전달함 ㅇㅇ ㅋㅋㅋ 포칼은 30Hz 부터 롤오프



Focal THD is high for the bass and then drop to 20db with a peak at 1.5k (crossover?).

1.5k 크로스오버? 지점에 피크가 있지만 THD가 20db로 줄어듦.  



Phantom THD is high for the bass and then drop smoothly. It is not better on average than the focal.

팬텀은 저역부터 고역까지 부드럽게 THD 가 감소함. 포칼보다는 높은 편

Focal set is around 2.5k and Devialet is around 6k. Quality wise they are very similar, the phantom can deliver more bass and more SPL if you need them. Possibly the cheapest version of the phantom would deliver exactly the same performance with a loss of 6db. Price wise it would match the focal with less clutter and possibly a better look.

팬톰6000$ 이 포칼 세트 2500$ 보다 약 2.3배 더 비싸지만 저음과 음압이 좋음.

저음 6dB 손실을 감수하고 더 싼 버전의 Phantom이 비슷한 성능을 내줄거라고 본다.

감성과 외관 측면에서 저렴한 버전의 팬톰 스피커가 가성비 괜찮아 보임

In a large room, the phantom impressed me: they are very good off axis, the sweet spot is very large. Subjectively we still prefer our tannoy+accuphase+roon+room correction.

넓은 방에서 매우큰 offaxis 와 sweet spot이 인상적임.

근데 난 주관적으로  탄노이 아큐페이즈 룬, 룬코렉션이 더 낫다..

To be noted: the phantom has a super annoying 200ms delay due to its dsp, not a prb for listening for music but i can not track nor play piano with it. My TV also does not know how to shift audio and video. Devialet told me that a minimum phase version exist with a reduce latency. I will reconsider when this firmware is available.

근데 사실 DSP에 200ms 딜레이가 있음.  피아노칠때 매우 불편하단다... TV 볼땐 영상이랑 소리가 따로 놈.

드비알레에선 레이턴시 감소를 위해 minimum phase filter 펌웨어를 사용하도록 권장함.

생각보다 괜찮아서 놀람.